Unkey Dumps Serverless: Performance Beats the Hype

Serverless Re-Evaluation: A Cautionary Tale

The Unkey case study provides a valuable lesson in the practical limitations of serverless architectures, particularly for performance-critical applications. The core issue, as highlighted, revolves around the inherent stateless nature of serverless functions. This necessitates reliance on external caching mechanisms, introducing network latency that can negate the benefits of serverless for applications demanding low-latency responses. The article effectively illustrates how the overhead of managing these external services, along with the complexities of event handling and analytics, can outweigh the perceived advantages of serverless, such as scalability and cost efficiency. The need to build custom proxies and pipelines to work around the stateless design underscores the "complexity tax" Thomas mentions, highlighting a crucial trade-off between initial ease of deployment and long-term maintainability and performance.

Furthermore, the Unkey experience resonates with the broader trend of companies re-evaluating their serverless deployments, as seen with Amazon Prime Video. This suggests that the initial appeal of serverless, often driven by its promise of reduced operational overhead, might be less compelling for high-throughput, latency-sensitive workloads. The article clearly points out that while serverless can be a great fit for event-driven and intermittent workloads, it's not a silver bullet. The shift to a stateful architecture, in Unkey's case, resulted in a significant performance boost and reduced operational complexity, emphasizing the importance of choosing the right architecture based on specific application requirements. This also brings into question the long-term cost implications of serverless for certain use cases as the volume of traffic grows.

Finally, the article touches upon the impact on developer experience. The move to a monolithic Go application simplified local development and facilitated easier self-hosting for customers. This highlights the importance of developer productivity and the potential drawbacks of vendor lock-in with serverless platforms. While Cloudflare Workers are stable, the article suggests that the abstractions they introduce can impede development velocity and limit customization options. The Unkey story serves as a reminder that technological choices should be driven by business needs, performance requirements, and the developer experience, rather than solely by the allure of the latest architectural trend.

Key Points

• Unkey's API authentication service migrated from serverless Cloudflare Workers to stateful Go servers due to performance bottlenecks related to caching and latency.
• The move resulted in a sixfold performance improvement, eliminating the need for complex workarounds and custom infrastructure.
• The primary issue was the stateless nature of serverless, which required fetching cached data over the network, introducing latency that negated the benefits of serverless.
• The team spent more time managing the serverless infrastructure than building features for their customers.
• The shift also unlocked features like self-hosting for customers and simplified local development.
• The experience aligns with other companies questioning the suitability of serverless for high-throughput, latency-sensitive workloads.

---

📖 Source: API Platform Unkey Ditches Serverless After Performance Struggles