AI Agents: Architecting for the Future, Avoiding Amnesia
Alps Wang
Dec 26, 2025 · 1 views
Architectural Discipline in the AI Age
The core insight of the article is the crucial need for architectural discipline when integrating AI agents. It highlights the dangers of 'agentic debt,' stemming from rapid autonomy growth outpacing architectural rigor. The emphasis on identity, governance, and decision-making discipline is well-placed, providing practical advice for navigating the complexities of AI-driven systems. The comparison between bots, assistants, and agents is helpful for understanding the varying levels of autonomy and associated risks. However, the article could benefit from including specific examples of architectural patterns and concrete best practices. While the principles are sound, illustrating them with practical code snippets or case studies would enhance the practical value for developers.
Key Points
- AI agents necessitate a disciplined architectural approach to avoid 'agentic debt.'
- Governance, identity, and decision-making are key to building trustworthy AI systems.
- Organizations should prioritize architectural principles over rapid, uncontrolled autonomy growth.
- Architectural amnesia, neglecting established best practices, is a major risk.

📖 Source: QCon AI NY 2025 - Becoming AI-Native Without Losing Our Minds To Architectural Amnesia
Related Articles
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
